|
I love watching
college football. I watch the regular season and I track who
ends up in which bowl and talk about who belongs and who shouldn't
be there. Then who deserves to be the national champion. Currently
we have the BCS, and all it has to offer. For the most part,
I believe it is a good system. Every year the debate goes on
about why there should be a playoff system. Simply put - there
shouldn't be!
A big part of the
game is TRADITION. Unlike politics, taxes and war, people's
lives (in general) are not going to be affected in life and
death matters with how football is played. It is an area where
we can enjoy doing something the way our fathers did regardless
of whether it is the best system or not. No one will die because
of it. Lets enjoy our traditions when we can, gather with family
and friends and have fun.
I do propose one
change in the system. Add one national championship game. A
panel of professionals, not affiliated with a specific school
or conference, will pick the two most deserving teams who won
their bowl games to play in the championship game. Most likely
the two teams will comes from the BCS games, as those are generally
the best teams. It will allow for the occasional cinderella
team that the computers bump to the ninth spot to still make
the game though.
This past year for
example, you would probably have seen Miami play Oregon. Even
if Nebraska had been bumped in the BCS, Colorado was next in
line, because the computers didn't give Oregon enough credit.
Oregon then trounced Colorado - what do computers know. But
overall, Miami, Colorado, Oregon, Nebraska were 4 of the top
teams in the nation. The pressure of the bowl games narrowed
down who the top two should have been.
One of the few arguments
I hear for a playoff is that a team that has a bad game in the
beginning of the season and losses is penalized and has to rely
on other teams to lose in order to get back to the top of the
pack If you have a playoff all the top 4, 8, or 16 get a chance
and the number three team won't get left out due to a bad game.
What if the best team has a bad game in the first round of the
playoffs and gets knocked out. The same result: you do not have
the top two in the championship. With my system, you can make
up for previous bad games with a big bowl win. If you have a
second bad game in the bowl, you don't deserve to be the champion
anyway. How you play under pressure is part of college football.
What about money?
Each school in the bowl games gets quite a bit of money. If
there are 25 bowls, then 50 teams gets payouts. If there is
an eight team playoff, only eight get the payouts, with the
champion actually getting three payouts. This would not exactly
be fair. There would have to be a division of the funds set
up and divide the money among all the 100+ schools in the division.
I do not see this happening.
Now all we have
to do is add one game, pick a panel of professionals, get multiple
sponsors (no corporate national championship), and have the
proceeds go to charity since all the bowl teams already got
paid.
|